The EEOC
Name of Student
Name of Course
Name of Professor
Date
The EEOC should file a lawsuit for gender discrimination because AB Pneumatics violated the interpretation of Title VII that outlaws gender-related discrimination. Title VII prohibits discrimination in terms of conditions, privileges, or terms of employment; hence there is enough ground to sue AB Pneumatics. The new manufacturing plant by the company only considered the needs of male employees as opposed to the needs of both male and female. Female rights have been violated by the requirement to leave the facility to seek a bathroom across the street to access one, yet their male colleagues have a bathroom within the plant facility. The rights have been violated because they have no access to bathroom facilities within the plant as opposed to their male counterparts (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964). Undue hardship comes into play when the females seek bathroom facilities across the road and can also a basis for EEOC to file a lawsuit against AP Pneumatics. From all indications, AB Pneumatics violated Title VII and should, therefore, be subjected to legal suits.
EEOC should check for remedies such as any plans by AB Pneumatics to build a female bathroom within the plant. A remedy can also occur when there is no enough evidence that disparate-impact discrimination took place in the organization. This is through the provision of breaks for the females to access the bathroom across the road. The female employees in AB A remedy for the situation is that despite being numerically less, AB Pneumatics should adopt a neutral approach when building bathrooms in the new plant.