The book highlights some text which is not easy to comprehend, as illustrated in the phrase below.
How comes assimilation is the primary alternative in racial purity in the USA, yet there notorious cases of racism as highlighted
The text does not provide sufficient information that would enable me to harness and understand the context in which the book is written, especially on assimilation being the alternative in creating sanity and purity in matters related to race.
I don’t understand how effective it worked, yet we still experience tons of racial discrimination incidences in the corridor of justice, learning institutions, and even in sporting activities. I request a more dig into the area to shed more light on how racial discrimination is openly showcased. The statement of assimilation being the primary alternative in racial purity is a bit contradictory since manya racial discrimination cases have been witnessed overtime in States.
Additionally, I experience challenges in understanding how liberalism facilitated the assimilation.
Yet a lot of hate is still experienced in the streets where the blacks fault whites for any mischief and vice versa. I request that we relook into the matter to ensure that utmost clarity is achieved.
Lastly, I would like to dispute and strongly disagree with the perception of white supremacy; great leaders are born and can be of any racial descent. It doesn’t have to be a white person. We should celebrate all our leaders and give them the best support they need to offer their services at best.
We have great world leaders of both African and European descent who had great impacts on their citizens’ well-being. Leaders as Calmax, Winston Churchill greatly impacted improving the general perception of leadership y dedicating their time and resources to ensuring social justice and ensuring peaceful coexistence in the United States.