Mapping the Logic: Aristotle’s Rhetoric
The article’s central assertion is to persuade the audience to understand the importance of touch as a crucial sense to human beings. Crucianelli (2020) uses logos, a strategic rhetorical device, to appeal for reasoning. As such, the author cites scientific and social research facts to bring out the point and persuade the readers on the importance of touch. Therefore, Crucianelli (2020) desire is to make the readers and audience comprehend why touch cannot be easily forgotten.
Citing the physical and psychological implications of touch, Crucianelli (2020) outlines that touch influence human development. Besides, touch acts as a communication token, and thus, it directly influences language and provides profound information regarding touch. She explains how touch affects human development and justifies the argument using scientific facts. Besides, Crucianelli (2020) justifies through detailed information on how touch influences communication and language, thus persuading the readers satisfactorily.
Throughout the article, Crucianelli (2020) portrays logic in the significant argument and supportive claims. The author demonstrates the importance of touch through evidence of the claims. The ideas are arranged so that the reader or the audience comprehends touch and its implications to human beings and relates the theoretical and empirical evidence of touch as a fundamental component of human senses. In addition, reasoning comes out clearly in the relationship between the cause of touch and its effects through scientific deductions.
Crucianelli (2020) documents evidence supporting the claim that touch is a language we cannot afford to forget. Notably, the author provides documentary evidence to show various research waves demonstrating the consequences of touch and its deprivation on human development. There is evidence of the implications of touch on human development and communication. Therefore, Crucianelli (2020) bases her argument on scientific and psychological evidence. Theories concerning social interactions and tactile interactions.
Crucianelli (2020) presents a critical analysis of the touch, its cause, and impacts on human development. Besides, the author outlines the origin of the sensation behind a touch. According to Crucianelli (2020), a touch influences the Oxytocin hormone release, which is responsible for calm relaxation that is responsible for stabilizing the blood pressure and heart rate. The author explains how the affective touch is distinct from the touch of other objects. Affective touch is crucial in maintaining a sense of self. For example, the author states, “Slow, caress-like touch is not only important for our survival but also our cognitive and social development.” The outline clearly shows an analysis of affective touch. From the empirical and theoretical evidence, Crucianelli (2020) draws an inferential interpretation of the need for touch. The review of scientific research studies essentially informs the evidence of the argument.
The audience reaction is portrayed as the touch-skepticism about the implications of technology in enabling the social distancing among individuals. Hence, physical touch is outdone by networking sites that facilitate social interactions for children and adolescents. The logic is vital in the importance of touch in human development and communication because it draws evidence from scientifically justified research. However, it is weak in the language of digital communication. Finally, the ethos and pathos reinforce the argument’s logic by bringing up the emotional and ethical aspect of touch and the corresponding outcomes.
References
Crucianelli, L. (2020). Touch is a language we cannot afford to forget – Laura Crucianelli | Aeon Essays. Retrieved from https://aeon.co/essays/touch-is-a-language-we-cannot-afford-to-forget