Analysis of health care standards indicates a disparity in the quality of health granted to patients, and this is determined by various factors, including social classes. By and large, the quality is measured by a comparison of the mortality rates, and in this manner, the conclusions become clear. Distribution of medicine and person eel then vary according to the socials calls of the patient. For example, a rich person is able to afford quality health care in a private health care institution, and this, in turn, increases their chance of escaping mortality, whereas the poor man has no option but to attend hospitals whose service may not be up to par in response to the severity of the disease. In any case, because of infrastructural variation among people who live in rural and urban areas, access to health has become easy for those in urban centers which enjoy diverse services of experts, whereas those in rural areas do not have the same quality of health care. Research also indicates that the mortality rate in places that do not have medical experts is higher than in an area where the doctor is on call and on standby. These statistics are notoriously present in the case of pregnant mothers who die out of a lack of expertise in childbirth.
On the other hand, inequality in health care is further propagated by the disparity in education, whereby some people do not believe in medicine but rather embrace a deep-set culture that does not believe in the health care setting. The position here is that they are entitled to these beliefs, but even as they explore alternative medication in traditional medicine. They should be amenable to technology when and if the situation is dire and calls for it.