Differentiating Curriculum and Modifying Items
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Name of School
Course
Date
Differentiating Curriculum and Modifying Items
Differentiation implies instruction tailoring so that the needs of individuals can be met. Whether teachers engage in content differentiation, products, learning environment, or process, the utility of a continuous assessment makes the approach to instruction successful. Differentiation, at its most basic stage, comprises the efforts put in by teachers to react to variance among students while in the classroom. Any time the teacher gets to a person or to a group so that their teaching can vary so as to develop the best study experience possible, it is said that that tutor is differentiating instruction. For this assignment, the classroom under observation is a 6th grade class in a primary school. In this classroom setup, half the class speaks in Spanish only. Some teachers can speak both in English and Spanish while others in English alone. For this reason, the curriculum has to be modified in class for the sake of instruction understanding for all.
As a TA, it is my first year observing a classroom having one student who speaks in English, unlike the rest who speak in Spanish. As a TA, it is my duty to ensure that all students in the class I am observing get to understand the same instructions given to everyone else. However, this time it was different for me. The first-year student in question could not properly understand the instructions I gave to the rest of the students since I teach in Spanish as well. It has, therefore been a tough experience making an attempt to be fair to the new student. He also had a difficult time answering questions, doing assignments and participating in a class like the rest. This is the reason why I decided to take my time to design my personal google classroom, where I could use whatever he uploaded in English into my google classroom and translate it to both English and Spanish. This brought a new experience an interesting one where we understood each other in the meantime as he learned Spanish.7t
The classroom today differs a lot from the classroom, which was there a decade ago. This is because of the transforming learner demographics across the United States since diversity has currently become the norm (Johnson & Johnson, 2016). As kids get into the system of education, with different backgrounds, they are subjected to new experiences, such as learning new languages, sporting activities, and change in course work. These new experiences cause a change in behaviours, interests, and styles of learning.
One way that I learned while in college concerning how this diversity can be addressed in classrooms is to concentrate on the structure of differentiated instruction. For this to be carried out, the student background must be put into consideration (Johnson & Johnson, 2016). Background knowledge refers to the things that have initially been learned by students both formally and informally via their individual life experiences. Background knowledge makes the foundation of studies for every student. It is critical for learners at any grade level, from reading understanding and also in content studies. Whatever learners are aware of concerning a topic can make new information learning easier.
Numerous English Language Learners have different educational and cultural backgrounds having a wide range of background knowledge associated with any specific topic. Many students at the secondary stage of learning may have high academic schooling with regards to their native language (Johnson & Johnson, 2016). Learners who may have experience in formal schooling that has been interrupted also exist, or there could be learners with little schooling or no schooling at all. Just the way no single kind of student exists, there is no single kind of ELL learner, and therefore must discover the way they must adjust instruction and the curriculum for every ELL learner.
ELL programs are very important when it comes to teaching. Connecting to learners’ individual life experiences is important for a number of good reasons (Johnson & Johnson, 2016). It can assist learners in discovering meaning in content learning, and connecting to an experience is capable of offering clarity and enhance retention of studies. Associating content to the individual lives of students and their experiences equally serve the function of validating the lives of learners, experiences, and culture.
A number of different possible points of view exist with respect to differentiation in teaching at school. While putting differentiation into consideration as a pedagogical practice, the major point of concern should be on the teacher adapting and changing to personal student requirements so as to add value to the knowledge and skills of students (Johnson & Johnson, 2016). Differentiation, however, takes place as part of the everyday practice since various learners are differently handled as they interact with teachers. This normally relies on the points of view which teachers have on the needs of their students. Differentiation may equally be considered as an element of a more worldwide strategy to pedagogical practice in the manner it can assist us in understanding the way teachers are capable of creating adaptive opportunities for learning for varied groups of learners, thereby satisfying their requirements of a group of students, and at the very time giving the people in that group the opportunity to meet their personal goals.
In the previous years, classroom differentiation has been recognized as a pedagogy that can be applied by teachers to make sure that the needs of students are addressed during their studies. Several people argue that throughout the world, the population of learners has increasingly become varied due to migration and involvement of learners having disabilities in schools and has become accepted by teachers that the entire classroom education is not the most appropriate pedagogy in which the learning requirements can be addressed.
The concentration on learners’ individual lives has contributed to another term referred to as student’s knowledge funds. Researchers explain that knowledge funds reflect on the historically gathered and culturally designed bodies of knowledge and expertise appropriate for household or personal functioning and wellness. The utility of the word fund links the concept of background knowledge as a learning foundation. It was created from the Spanish ground to imply the bottom groundwork.
This knowledge fund approach is radically distinct from observing the ELL learner as bearing a weakness or measuring poor reading of English words, writing, and also speaking. The term knowledge fund, in contrast, implies that learners bear knowledge assets, and the implied assets have been achieved through authentic individual experiences. These experiences can make a strong form of studying in comparison to studying via telling by as experienced in class traditionally.
Following the data on a fund of knowledge on the United States Department of Education Cultural and Linguistic Responsive page;
- Families bear immense knowledge that curriculums can understand and use in their family efforts of engagement.
- Learners bring with them knowledge funds from their residence and communities, which can be utilized in skill and concept development.
- Practices in the classroom, at times, underestimate and restraint the things that can be displayed by children intellectually.
- Teachers need to concentrate on assisting learners in finding meaning in practices instead of learning facts and rules.
Teachers are able to differentiate between learners in numerous ways. For instance, learners having distinct tasks at distinct levels, through adapting the speed of instruction to individual personal learners, or through giving differential cognitive and emotional support to personal students.
Secondary teachers should out into consideration that the ELL student group is among the rapidly growing groups in numerous school districts, regardless of the level of grade (Johnson & Johnson, 2016). Following the United States Department of Education statistics page, ELL learners had a population percentage of 9.2% in 2012. This puts a 1% rise, which roughly becomes 5 million learners over the past year.
Within any learning environment, students are not always the same in terms of the language they speak, their speed, and ability to understand, and hence a variance in abilities exist. This does not mean that they have to be left behind when others are moving forward, but it is the responsibility of a teacher to structure a model that will enable everyone to get the academic instruction in question. For example, for a Spanish-speaking class, it may be difficult for an English-speaking student to understand the instruction being given. The teaching assistant, therefore, must come up with an approach that will ensure the student learns what is being taught. This could be through the introduction and use of translating google applications to facilitate understanding.
References
Johnson, E. J., & Johnson, A. B. (2016). Enhancing Academic Investment through Home-School Connections and Building on ELL Students’ Scholastic Funds of Knowledge. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 12(1), 104-121.