Eva et al. (2019) Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research demonstrate detailed analysis in its provision of conceptual clarity of servant leadership vis-a-vis leadership-based approaches. Analysis typifies the information exchange process’s breakdown into components while maintaining transparency in the relative hierarchy of ideas and ensuring the explicit expression of relations. The article evaluated multiple methods of servant leadership while assessing scales of relevance and construction. Additionally, the study provided a holistic image of current literature on servant leadership while also providing a holistic vision of its future progression. According to Eva et al. (2019), servant leadership is a multi-faceted approach to getting things done without necessarily using coercive means through engaging subjects in several dimensions that include but are not limited to relational, ethical, psychological, and religious aspects. It emphasizes followers’ well-being, growth, and prosperity as its lack thereof affects employees’ effectiveness and organizational engagement, which often translates to the inability to gain a suitably competitive edge over rivals.
The significant analysis also manifests in the categorization of phases of servant leadership. According to Eva et al. (2019) servant, the first stage focused on the conceptual development of servant leaders, whereas the second featured the story of assessing the relations between servant leaders and outcomes through cross-sectional research. The article postulates that servant leadership is in its third phase, the model development level, which features more sophisticated research methodologies whose focus goes beyond simple relations. Analysis of complex interactions is essential in providing a greater understanding of servant leadership’s background, arbitrative mechanisms, and marginal conditions. The model development phase has also witnessed significant increases and changes in servant leadership studies, as captured in over a hundred articles on servant leadership since 2015. The proliferation of lessons on servant leadership highlights the need for comprehensive and integrated assessments of servant leadership not only to demonstrate theoretical differences between various forms of leadership and to provide additional measures of servant leadership