reasons for utilizing conceptual analysis
Conceptual analysis is a form of analysis that mainly involves the disintegrating of a concept into parts to acquire knowledge and a better comprehension of the specific philosophical matter being addressed by the concept. Based on the above definition, the significance of conceptual analysis to modern philosophers is not only practical but also necessary. The two reasons for utilizing conceptual analysis are: comprehending the definition of a concept and discovering how that concept associates with other philosophical challenges.
Moreover, as stated by Jackson, conceptual analysis is essential in showing that a factual claim concerning the world originates from its basic description (Laurence 256). However, as Jackson emphasizes that the conceptual analysis problem arises in relating the two claims (C and D) presented in contrasting words. He concludes that the problem can be solved by resolving what counts as C or D through the traditional conceptual analysis. This traditional method for applying conceptual analysis believes that the concept’s base is its meaning. Consequently, without traditional conceptual analysis, it would be impossible to examine various asserted higher-level world description about its essential description (Laurence 257).
The tripartite theory of knowledge
The tripartite theory of knowledge is normally shortened to the “JTB” analysis implying “justified true belief states that if people believe something to be true with justification, then it qualifies as knowledge ((Ichikawa, n.p). In the 1900s, the majority of the literature on knowledge analysis accepted and utilized the JTB analysis as its commencement-point. The three ancient conditions of knowledge are truth, belief and justification.
The truth condition implies truth expresses how things are and not how persons can portray them. On the other hand, belief condition indicates persons can only perceive what they believe, and that lack of belief hinders knowledge. Finally, the justification condition emphasizes that true opinion is not adequate for knowledge unless it has an appropriate knowing background (Ichikawa, n.p).
Necessary condition
A necessary condition is a requirement that must be available for something to occur. To illustrate this necessity, the tripartite theory of knowledge includes two theories (E and F). E knows F only when F is true, and E believes that F is true. As a result, E’s belief that F’s is true becomes justified. The above illustration concludes that the three conditions of truth, belief and justification are necessary to label something as knowledge. This example implies that if we don’t have one of the conditions, we will not gain knowledge. Separately, belief is a requirement for knowledge because it suggests a kind of acknowledgement to a particular proposition. Contrarily, truth is a necessary condition considering that for something to be valid; it does not need our agreement. Ideally, the subtraction of truth from knowledge would result in belief. As a necessary condition of knowledge, justification should not entail guesswork or false evidence that might turn out valid but rather on real evidence (OGAN 30).
Sufficient condition
Diversely, a sufficient condition is a requirement or collection of requirements that will generate the thing (Brennan n.p). Thus if we have one requirement, the other requirements must follow; one condition guarantees the other. An example of sufficient condition is when a student gets ninety percent in the philosophy class, he gets a final grade of A. this illustration implies that once ninety percent has been achieved it automatically follows that the grade acquired will be A.
Jointly sufficient condition
Jointly sufficient condition implies that all necessary individual components must be integrated for something to occur. A life example is that for one to marry in various jurisdictions, one must have the minimum age for marriage, sound mind and should not be already married. These three conditions are jointly sufficient in the different areas if one meets all of them he can get married.
In summary, this assignment tackles conceptual analysis which involves the breakdown of a concept into its various components for better understanding of concept and aid in relating it with other concepts. Additionally, the tripartite theory of knowledge is an analysis that takes into consideration the conditions of truth, belief and justification in determining knowledge.