Assessing Risk Capability Maturity Model
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
Assessing Risks Capability Maturity Model
The capability maturity model acts as a useful method that helps measure institutions’ security risk and management process and progress from initial states to optimized conditions. It helps to explain the institution’s maturity on the different capabilities levels. In the initial stages, and organizations may experience several risks. Foremost it can face poorly aligned functions that have not documented strategies (Chapman, 2019). Some risks also come with manual management of processes and the lack of integrated systems with a massive reliance on manual documentation and spreadsheets. Besides that, there is the problem of progression being measured, and many project budgets being overboard. To mitigate most of the risk, the institution tries as much as possible to document all the activities and provider proper procedures to avoid most risks.
The second stage or the repeatable helps to describe risk like the loosely aligned functions. It also provides documents of the informal policies applied to personal processes with varied skill levels (Chapman, 2019). They look at the soft risks and areas where methods may differ between projects. In the stage, the project’s actual progress is measured. The risk of the problem with the report changes is also experienced in the stage. The problem with this stage is that the management team usually asks for more paperwork and documentation, which leads to quality integration and, at other times, costs becoming higher. To manage the risk managers, their team members spend a lot of time executing the project functionality instead of explaining what is happening (Rea-Guaman et al., 2017). Moreover, they try to better estimate the project and make them more flexible.
The third stage is the defined stage that described the strategic management structure and well-defined process. The stage provides a few risks as decisions are analyzed systematically. However, in other situations, the product may not meet the fundamental requirement it was intended to (Rea-Guaman et al., 2017). There is also the risk of design requirements that comes out during the implementation process. However, the stage risk is effectively mitigated, and they usually don’t take a team by surprise. The methods are made standard to help identify the risk, and quality gates are brought continuously throughout the project.
In the managed stage, which is the fourth level, it explains the functions aligned with the institution’s strategic plan and personnel. The risks that occur at the stage include the dangers of process performances and inappropriate strategic plans and personnel (Le & Hoang, 2017). However, to overcome the problem, the institution should foster quantitative project management and optimal process performances. The last stage is the optimized level, which describes all the management processes executed at the optimal stage with the best practices. Technology processes are optimized to leverage information through real time security threat analysis (Le & Hoang, 2017). At the stage, most risks have been eliminated. This stage also takes care of detecting and removing defects from other strategies for the project to be deployed.
References
Chapman, R. J. (2019). Exploring the value of risk management for projects: improving capability through the deployment of a maturity model. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47(1), 126-143.
Le, N. T., & Hoang, D. B. (2017). Capability maturity model and metrics framework for cyber cloud security. Scalable Computing.
Rea-Guaman, A. M., San Feliu, T., Calvo-Manzano, J. A., & Sanchez-Garcia, I. D. (2017, October). Comparative study of cybersecurity capability maturity models. In International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (pp. 100-113). Springer, Cham.